On Tuesday, February 5th, 24 states will hold primaries, caucuses, and state conventions to determine the number of delegates that will be elected to the national conventions this summer. The two main political parties in this country, Republicans and Democrats, will then choose a nominee at their respective conventions who will in turn square off against each other in a national election in early November that will determine who will be the next President of the United States. After Super Tuesday, the Democrats will elect about 54% of its total delegates and the Republicans will select around 41%.
Okay, that’s Civics 101, but what do you tell your children about the elections and this seemingly endless process, if anything?
Well, please do engage with them in talking about “the process.” It’s a truly an amazing and wonderful way of electing one of the world’s most powerful leaders that often gets lost by talking about the individuals and the acrimony. I resist telling my own children who I intend to support, but I do spend a fair amount of time talking about the country as a whole and educational policies in particular.
I do this for two reasons. First, we as a nation must get away from the winners and losers mentality that makes politics just another sport. Will Hillary put Barack in his place? Has Bill overstepped his bounds? Will McCain and Romney win the ultra-right wing support of the Republican Party if Mike Huckabee drops out? All of these “ripped from the headlines” kinds of questions dilute the real issue of the marvel of this peaceful (and convoluted) process that is the envy and (sometimes) scourge of the world, especially when it is rammed down the throats of other nations and people. Second, we owe our children, many of them who have never experienced the kind of political upheaval that other children in the world have experienced, an explanation about what process truly means.
A few years ago, I was invited to a symposium at the Castanoa Retreat Center in Half Moon Bay by the Harwood Institute to discuss civic engagement. In off election years, particularly in underserved communities, people depend on certain organizations as beacons in the night to get them and their children through the storms that they encounter every day. A contingent of leaders from the Agassi School, including myself, along with other “Centers of Strength” in Las Vegas were invited to discuss issues relating to poverty, education, and social services. Our goal was to just talk about our process. How did we do what we were supposed to be good at? How did we build a school out of thin air and create a (then) $60 million endowment in less than ten years to keep the school running for forever? Finally, how did we get people to feel less silo-ed (i.e., isolated) from the process of civic engagement?
In short, the answer was what Jane Addams at Hull House did so fabulously well. It was to provide her community with highly process-oriented choices. Addams (1860 – 1935) collaborated with a great many people and made Hull House a Center of Strength in the City of Chicago at the turn of the Twentieth Century. Hull House provided young immigrant women in Addams’ “Settlement House” not just a community but a way to advance themselves beyond their present circumstances by engaging deeply in Democratic principles. Hull House had a library, gymnasium, swimming pool, Chautauqua’s (which is like the Berkeley Extension School—or adult education—today), and much, much more. Hull House is the model for Progressive Schools because it explicitly taught Democracy.
So, what does that have to do with you, your children, and the Democratic Process?
Understand that Presidio Hill School is our Hull House, of sorts, allowing children and parents the opportunity to engage in process driven work and ideas that will carry them far beyond their current circumstances. You can discuss the issues that are important to your family because even as early as kindergarten your children are discussing “big ideas” at school related to Democracy. Find ways to engage them in process-oriented work that underscores the democratic principles of vision, collaboration (rather than service), and sacrifice. Again, Progressive Education does teach a specific kind of engagement and is activist in its origins.
One small way that we at PHS give back and are in collaboration in our community is by being a polling place on Election Day. Truly, we are so limited and constrained by space that having one more box in our school is a hardship. However, having PHS as a Polling Place teaches a subtle yet powerful message, which is we at PHS care deeply about the Democratic Process. It also says that we care about our city, State, and country. Patriotism is not always about flag-waving and bumper stickers, but it is about making sure that we are a part of the process in a small but symbolic way.
Ghandi, King, and Mother Teresa were all activist in the Democratic tradition. Yet, their greatest strengths as leaders involved the processes that gave people hope, a sense of wonder, and the ability to transform the lives of others by bearing witness to the work they did in collaboration with others. In the end, that is what we do, that is what distinguishes us as a school, and as a community.
Showing posts with label Mike Huckabee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mike Huckabee. Show all posts
Friday, February 01, 2008
Tuesday, January 01, 2008
Happy New Year! What's Old is What's New
So, it's the New Year! What does it hold in store for us as a people, as a nation of innovators and learners. Most of our early attention this year will be centered on what's happening in Iowa, Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq. Taking our collective eyes off of the ball.
Perhaps we'll even pay some attention to what the Israelis and Palestinian's are up to (vis-a-vis the Bush administration wanting to salvage it's reputation in the world. Can you say, "Condi-NOT!")
The real attention should be on the future of education and what the early Presidential primaries may have in store for the school children in this country for the next three generations. Although we can no longer ignore world events (global warning, enter stage right), we must also keep our eye on the ball as it relates to the dumbing of the American child.
One woman that I spoke to said that No Child Left Behind poses a grave and present danger to the autonomy of our nation as a civilization. Does this sound like a hysterical ranting of yet another John Dewey Progressive who doesn't quite get that the Me Generation ended along with the Seventies and hippies?
Yet, witness the resurrection of Jimmy Carter, a man with plenty of vision and great ideas and very little follow through, at least some folks would say so. Did Jimmy Carter's presidency derail Al Gore's hope at the White House--or Barack Obama's? Can effete men and women of principle win the highest office in the land? Or must all politician's these days be shrewd political operatives who pander to all sorts of special interests in this country to get anywhere at all? The George W. Bushes, the Mike Huckabees, and the Hillary Clintons. With special interests groups firmly in hand, Presidents and candidates like these offer little new or innovative in the way of foreign or domestic policies. Who cares if Hillary will be the first woman President in this country if the results are the very same as they are today. Perhaps she has a little more vigor than our current feckless leaders in power, who lie and steal and cheat and lie, to great effect, shamelessly telling people just what they want (and perhaps need) to hear.
"I won the election fair and square." "There is no global warning." "It's okay to reveal the identity of a CIA agent and have it not matter all that much." "Let's send many thousands of young men and women to the Middle East and fight a war that has always been and will always be about oil." "It's okay to serve up one of the worst educational public policies in our nation's history as long as we divert the attention of the American people on what really matters."
In short, I am angry this New Years Day. I don't feel that we as a people and as a nation are any closer to solving what ails us. In writing this blog (and dedicating my career to education), I have put all of my eggs into one basket--that of America's school children--while they and their teachers are being scrambled to death with meaningless tests, jumping through hoops that will always tell them that they are less than. Also, if the tests that come with the scourge of a law are designed to make the school children in this country be great followers who don't question authority in any way--or the opposite of the root word of education, which is "educere," meaning to "lead out"--then we are in for generations of heartache. We must do more to fight for what matters most and has always mattered most.
Last Century, we spent a lot of time working on infrastructure--dams, roads and highways, schools, skyscrapers, fiber optics. This year and into this next epoch, we must use micro-technologies as our metaphor and rallying cry for what to concentrate on next. People, each and every one of us, especially children, should be moved to the center. No Child Left Behind serves as one of those 1984 lessons of marketing the opposite. While drop out rates soar in middle and high schools, and boys of all stripes and hues lose out in higher ed, then we must re-focus our attention on what matters most and what has always mattered most in this country...
Education.
Perhaps we'll even pay some attention to what the Israelis and Palestinian's are up to (vis-a-vis the Bush administration wanting to salvage it's reputation in the world. Can you say, "Condi-NOT!")
The real attention should be on the future of education and what the early Presidential primaries may have in store for the school children in this country for the next three generations. Although we can no longer ignore world events (global warning, enter stage right), we must also keep our eye on the ball as it relates to the dumbing of the American child.
One woman that I spoke to said that No Child Left Behind poses a grave and present danger to the autonomy of our nation as a civilization. Does this sound like a hysterical ranting of yet another John Dewey Progressive who doesn't quite get that the Me Generation ended along with the Seventies and hippies?
Yet, witness the resurrection of Jimmy Carter, a man with plenty of vision and great ideas and very little follow through, at least some folks would say so. Did Jimmy Carter's presidency derail Al Gore's hope at the White House--or Barack Obama's? Can effete men and women of principle win the highest office in the land? Or must all politician's these days be shrewd political operatives who pander to all sorts of special interests in this country to get anywhere at all? The George W. Bushes, the Mike Huckabees, and the Hillary Clintons. With special interests groups firmly in hand, Presidents and candidates like these offer little new or innovative in the way of foreign or domestic policies. Who cares if Hillary will be the first woman President in this country if the results are the very same as they are today. Perhaps she has a little more vigor than our current feckless leaders in power, who lie and steal and cheat and lie, to great effect, shamelessly telling people just what they want (and perhaps need) to hear.
"I won the election fair and square." "There is no global warning." "It's okay to reveal the identity of a CIA agent and have it not matter all that much." "Let's send many thousands of young men and women to the Middle East and fight a war that has always been and will always be about oil." "It's okay to serve up one of the worst educational public policies in our nation's history as long as we divert the attention of the American people on what really matters."
In short, I am angry this New Years Day. I don't feel that we as a people and as a nation are any closer to solving what ails us. In writing this blog (and dedicating my career to education), I have put all of my eggs into one basket--that of America's school children--while they and their teachers are being scrambled to death with meaningless tests, jumping through hoops that will always tell them that they are less than. Also, if the tests that come with the scourge of a law are designed to make the school children in this country be great followers who don't question authority in any way--or the opposite of the root word of education, which is "educere," meaning to "lead out"--then we are in for generations of heartache. We must do more to fight for what matters most and has always mattered most.
Last Century, we spent a lot of time working on infrastructure--dams, roads and highways, schools, skyscrapers, fiber optics. This year and into this next epoch, we must use micro-technologies as our metaphor and rallying cry for what to concentrate on next. People, each and every one of us, especially children, should be moved to the center. No Child Left Behind serves as one of those 1984 lessons of marketing the opposite. While drop out rates soar in middle and high schools, and boys of all stripes and hues lose out in higher ed, then we must re-focus our attention on what matters most and what has always mattered most in this country...
Education.
Sunday, December 30, 2007
US Presidential Candidates On Education: Mike Huckabee
Mike Huckabee is a rising star in the Republican Party. Republicans have been looking for a telegenic candidate like Huckabee ("What would you give me for Mike Huckabee and Kevin Spacey") who believes what the right wing element of the party believes. Huckabee is a died in the wool neo-con and the Right loves him. This is what USA Today says about his stand on education...
Mike Huckabee on education
On No Child Left Behind law
Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, a Republican, supports the education law known as No Child Left Behind. Signed by President Bush in 2002, the law requires every state to test students annually. Failure to meet certain requirements results in reduced federal funding to schools.
Though he has said opponents of the law have maligned it as unwarranted federal intrusion, Huckabee agrees states should oversee implementation of the law. “While there is value in the No Child Left Behind law's effort to set high national standards, states must be allowed to develop their own benchmarks,” he wrote on his campaign website.
On making college affordable
If elected president, Huckabee says he would be willing to provide federally funded, state-administered scholarships for students who go into national service, such as teaching in high-poverty schools. He also supports scholarships for low-income students who do well in high school.
Other education priorities
When he was governor of Arkansas, Huckabee emphasized arts and music education for young students. He’d like to continue that as president, saying it’s “crucial that children flex both the left and right sides of the brain. … Our future economy depends on a creative generation.”
Mike Huckabee on education
On No Child Left Behind law
Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, a Republican, supports the education law known as No Child Left Behind. Signed by President Bush in 2002, the law requires every state to test students annually. Failure to meet certain requirements results in reduced federal funding to schools.
Though he has said opponents of the law have maligned it as unwarranted federal intrusion, Huckabee agrees states should oversee implementation of the law. “While there is value in the No Child Left Behind law's effort to set high national standards, states must be allowed to develop their own benchmarks,” he wrote on his campaign website.
On making college affordable
If elected president, Huckabee says he would be willing to provide federally funded, state-administered scholarships for students who go into national service, such as teaching in high-poverty schools. He also supports scholarships for low-income students who do well in high school.
Other education priorities
When he was governor of Arkansas, Huckabee emphasized arts and music education for young students. He’d like to continue that as president, saying it’s “crucial that children flex both the left and right sides of the brain. … Our future economy depends on a creative generation.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)